If a person copies and earns $2,500 from plagiarized work what legal repercussions could they face? Would they face fines or prison sentences, and for how long?
Copyright is the legal right that the creator of a work has to it. The WIPO defines two types of rights under copyright:
Economic Rights: rights to financial benefits from the use of the work
Moral rights :rights that aren’t financial but are still important. For example, the right to claim authorship or the right to prevent harmful changes.
Copyright is not a new concept. Copyright laws have been around since the 18th century. However, the digital age has created new challenges to copyright and demands new ways to protect it as well.
Positives:
Negatives of copyright:
Using content created by someone else without permission or citation can have consequences, such as a fine or an order to remove copyrighted content.
If you claim the said content was your own, even unintentionally, you might be found guilty of plagiarism.
Plagiarism is when you take the content of someone else and claim it as your own. The most common type of plagiarism students hear about is the plagiarism of written ideas and/or phrases. It’s possible to accidentally plagiarize by simply forgetting to cite the original source of an idea or phrase.
Plagiarism can have serious consequences, especially in the world of academia. It can get students expelled and see the careers of professors destroyed. Furthermore, there could be legal consequences as well.
It’s not difficult in the age of image searches and Turnitin.com to be caught plagiarizing or violating copyright. It can also be incredibly disheartening for content creators to see their hard work taken without permission or credit.
In companies like Qualcomm, patents have been a way for the company to gain revenue. However, a term known as GPL(General public license) can create clashes with the legal rights of patents. GPL is known as the right for users to manipulate and use the software for their own benefits. GPL protects your rights with two steps: (1) assert copyright on the software, and (2) offer you this License giving you legal permission to copy, distribute and/or modify it. An example is linux. Linux is open-source(original code which is made free and available for the public.) software, and users have the freedom to view, modify, and distribute the source code, provided they also distribute any modifications under the same GPL license terms. Open source licensing also contributed to helping both contributors and users and they are a binding legal contract between author and user that declares the certain conditions in which a piece of software can be used.
Back to qualcomm, GPL can prohibit people from making money off of their patents, which doesn’t favor the creators of the code. Qualcomm instead wants something known as royalty payment where the ones using the code, patent, or idea should pay royalty. Royalty payment is defined as a regular fee paid by a licensee to a licensor in exchange for the licensee to gain access to the licensors code.
Black Duck® software composition analysis (SCA) is a tool that helps development teams manage risks linked to open source and third-party code in applications and containers. It addresses security, quality, and license compliance concerns, ensuring software integrity by identifying and mitigating vulnerabilities while maintaining adherence to licensing requirements.
This whoel comcept may sound simple and unimportant, but think about the Students of Today, often they are given an assignment and instead of developing their own algorithm they opt to copy something off the internet. Well, don’t think the Workers of Today are entirely different. In summary, it is important to know the type of software license you are copying, it could impact billions of dollars in business.
Open Source Compliance:
Patent Litigation:
Intellectual Property Protection:*
Data Privacy and Security:
Describe the key differences between the Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal, Open Source MIT License, and Open Source GPL License. Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal (CC0): CC0 is designed to dedicate works to the public domain, allowing creators to relinquish all copyright and related rights. It offers maximum flexibility by removing restrictions on usage, modification, and distribution, imposing no conditions on users.
Open Source MIT License: The MIT License, a permissive license, enables developers to freely use, modify, and distribute software while requiring the inclusion of the original copyright and license notice. It is simple and permissive, with minimal restrictions.
Open Source GPL License: The GPL is a copyleft license aiming to keep derivative works open source. Users can freely use, modify, and distribute the software, but any distributed derivative work must adhere to the GPL, creating a “viral” effect.
Explain the significance of choosing an appropriate license for personal and team GitHub repositories, especially for the CPT project. How does this relate to the broader themes of legal and ethical concerns in computing?